Thank you to everyone who completed the QA Evaluation Survey and provided their feedback!
The survey was sent to registrants who recently completed their QA cycle (July 1, 2024 鈥� June 30, 2026) to better understand their experiences and challenges related to completing their QA Program requirements.
Out of 3,310 registrants who received the survey, 359 responded (10.8% response rate).
The survey included 11 questions covering the following topics:
- Demographic Information
- Self-Assessment Requirements
- Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Requirements
- Program Value
- Communication and Resources
The survey did not address the QA Audit or Peer Assisted Review processes, as these apply only to select registrants and are not part of the Standard QA participation requirements.
Survey Highlights
- 74.1% were registered in psychology, 24.5% in applied behaviour analysis, and 1.4% in both professions
- More than 70% felt the self-assessment requirements for their certificate type/status were reasonable.
- Approximately 75% felt that the CPD requirements for their certificate type/status were reasonable.
- Approximately 85% reported being able to complete the minimum hours needed to fulfill the Standard CPD learning medium requirements without difficulty (i.e., Section A & B)
- Over 70% reported being able to complete the minimum hours needed to fulfill the Standard CPD content requirements without difficulty (i.e., Ethics and Jurisprudence, EDI, and Supervision)
- 77% indicated that they have applied or will apply the knowledge and skills they gained through their QA participation during the last cycle to their practice.
- 70% found the QA section of the 91视频 website to be a helpful resource for requirement information.
Thank you again to everyone who participated and shared their feedback. We were pleased to hear from so many registrants about their experience with the QA program and appreciate the time you took to share your perspectives. Your feedback will help inform future improvements to the program.
Respondent Breakdown
